You Lie- The Truth

What’s worse: a member of Congress calling the President a liar during a joint session, or the President lying to the people and their representatives during a joint session?

The outrage over South Carolina Representative Joe Wilson’s two word outburst is beyond preposterous, not only because he was correct, but also because of the total hypocrisy of those doing the loudest complaining.

Flashback to the 2005 State of the Union Address: President Bush was heckled by the Democrats during a section of the speech on Social Security. No one apologized, and the mainstream media expressed no outrage over the “disrespect” to the President. This reveals a double standard the Democrats hold in regards to what they can do, and what others can’t do.

The State of the Union is an important and historical moment for the United States, having presented proposals such as the Monroe Doctrine. However, the recent speech by President Obama was nothing more than a political power play, designed to give an already media obsessed politician even more airtime.

Representative Wilson was absolutely accurate in calling Obama out on his dishonesty.

The only bill that passed the committee stage in Congress does not have any enforcement for verifying the citizenship of those receiving government insurance, opening the program up to illegal immigrants. This bill merely pays lip service to blocking illegal aliens from benefitting from our tax dollars. Furthermore, Democrats shot down amendments detailing methods of authentication. ThisĀ  is akin to posting a speed limit on a road, and telling everyone to follow it even though no police will be watching the area.

The Democrats have been stretching the truth throughout the entire health care debate and can not stomach someone confronting them during “their” moment. But thousands of Americans finally got to see someone stand up to Obama, and they have responded by donating over $1 million to Representative Wilson’s reelection campaign. Some time ago, Mark Twain said that, “a half-truth is the most cowardly of lies.” The Democrats have clearly been found guilty of cowardice by this standard and now have to deal with the people of America who refuse to be lied to anymore, people like Joe Wilson.

Second American Revolution

Thomas Jefferson once said, “The people are the ultimate guardians of their own liberty.”

Over the past few weeks, we have seen millions of Americans take this to heart as they attended town hall meetings en masse to give their “representatives” from Congress a piece of their minds.

Protesters dominated these meetings, demanding a return to smaller government and accusing many politicians of treading on the Constitution.

Between these contentious town hall meetings and the recent wave of nationwide tea party protests, some say we are on the verge of a second American Revolution: a revolution restoring America to what those first Revolutionaries intended it to be.

And what could be more fitting than for the second revolution to begin in much the same way as the first, through town hall meetings and a tea party?

In 1765 Samuel Adams and the Sons of Liberty had their first town hall meeting in Boston. Not long after this, Jefferson began organizing meetings in Virginia. Then, in 1776 the Boston Tea Party sparked the beginning of the American Revolution.

During that first revolution, our struggle was against an overseas government that was taxing us to death and allowing us no representation.

This time the government we are fighting against lies just across the Potomac River, yet they still want to pass huge bills that would raise taxes and the deficit. They refuse to represent what the people really want.

Countless Americans are tired of the government encroaching into every corner of their lives. This latest round of bills regulating everything from carbon emissions to Granny’s prescriptions is the last straw for many.

If the politicians in Washington want to remain there after next November, maybe they should start listening to their constituents rather than trying to convince them that they don’t know what is good for themselves.

The American people have spoken. Let the Second American Revolution begin!

Health Care: Code Blue

President Obama took six months to choose a dog for his little girls but expects Congress to shove a 1,000-plus-page Health Care Bill down our throats in a matter of weeks.

As more information comes to light about the proposed bill, support among voters slips. A recent Rasmussen poll shows that while 44 percent of Americans strongly oppose the plan, only 26 percent strongly support it. Additionally, more than half of all Americans oppose the proposed Heath Care Bill.

One of the principal concerns of opponents is cost. President Obama asked for a $634 billion “down payment” on heath care costs, and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the Health Care Bill to cost $1.6 trillion over the next 10 years.

Who will be paying for this enormous price tag?

Just look in the mirror.

There are two options for paying for this bill. First, we ignore the cost and add $239 billion to the federal deficit over the next 10 years.

The second option is to raise taxes now in order to cover it.

Either way you and I (or our children and grandchildren) will be stuck with the cost of this bill.

The economy will also have to pay, due to the “play or pay” mandate that penalizes businesses failing to give health insurance to their employees. The current House Bill would impose an 8 percent payroll tax on these businesses, which according to the Employment Practices Institute would cost 995,000 jobs a year.

It would also cause 1.5 million full-time employees to fall to part-time status, resulting in $75 billion in lost wages annually.

A study by the Heritage Foundation also found that 10.2 million workers would face stunted wages and loss of benefits, and 5.2 million would be at risk for unemployment as employers attempt to find ways to pay for this mandate.

This is a death sentence for our already struggling economy.

Those who oppose the bill are also concerned about the supposed number of uninsured people in America. They claim that of the 48 million uninsured the bill supporters claim exist, at least 12 million are illegal aliens.

President Obama and others have said many times that the bill does not cover illegal aliens. That may not be the case.

The Congressional Research Service reveals that there is a provision in the bill dealing with illegal aliens not being able to receive coverage; however, there is no method for verification of citizenship.

On July 17, the House Ways and Means Committee struck down an amendment by Nevada Congressman Dean Heller that would have made the verification process the same for Federal Health Care as is currently required for Medicaid and Medicare.

Rationing of health care and an increase in government bureaucracy are also issues heavily debated. The New York Times recently published an article supporting the idea of rationing, stating that a $54,000 drug that would keep a cancer patient alive for an extra six months might not be worth the price.

The House bill provides for the institution of a “National Health Board” that would be responsible for determining which treatments would be cost efficient and may be covered under the public option. This is exactly what former Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin was referring to when she mentioned “Death Panels:” a government-run bureaucracy that will determine whether the drug that will keep you alive is “worth it.”

Another concern that is crucial to determining support for the proposal, and that has also been mentioned by many adversaries of the bill, is abortions funded by tax payers.

You may have heard Democrats questioned about this issue during town hall meetings, and their answers leave much to be desired.

Most of them have reiterated the idea that the bill does not mention abortion, as if this would mean it is not covered. But the fact of the matter is that the 14 most common medical procedures are not mentioned anywhere in the bill.

Therefore, are we expecting these procedures not to be covered?

If they were not, then the proposed bill would be pointless.

Many congressmen attempted to add amendments to the bill which would specifically prohibit the coverage of abortion, including our own congressman John Fleming, but all amendments been shot down.

Hillary Clinton said in April that the current administration would consider abortion “an important part of women’s health and reproductive health.”

Consequently, it is not difficult to determine that abortion will indeed be covered under this plan. In this manner Obama, Reid and Pelosi would have you and I pay for the more than one million abortions performed in America every year.

Cost, the insuring of illegal aliens, rationing of health care and tax-payer-funded abortions are just the tip of the iceberg that will hopefully cause concerned Americans to sink this titanic Health Care Bill.

I advise you to look at the bill yourself, and proceed with caution. (My computer froze when I attempted to download it.) Decide for yourselves whether or not it deserves support. You will at least be doing a better job than many of our representatives in Washington.